[Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem

[Rich Brown]

Hi Gene,

> On May 6, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang at ieee.org> wrote:
> 
> It seems like you signed off on this challenge. Don’t do that. Help give me the tools to push this to the next level.

Not at all - I'm definitely signed up for this. But I collected all these points so we can be clear-eyed about the objections that people cite. 

Bufferbloat definitely exists. And there are straightforward technical solutions. And as you say, our challenge is to find a way to build the case for broad adoption of these techniques. 

Best regards,

Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20240507/ecb7b91e/attachment.html>