[Starlink] Fwd: Here is the first edition of the report: Will LEO Satellite Direct-to-Cellular Networks Make Traditional Mobile Networks Obsolete?

Ulrich Speidel u.speidel at auckland.ac.nz
Wed Jan 29 23:15:18 EST 2025


Read: cheap phones have noisy receivers or crappy antennas, right?

The macro cell effect you describe is well known here - I typically 
teach this in class to my students here in Auckland. Many of them live 
in the CBD, where there's a 5G mast at every corner, so their batteries 
last forever. I then ask them whether they've ever driven down to 
Wellington (700 km or so through some fairly wap-wappy stretches of 
road) and quite a few hands go up. I then ask them whether anyone 
noticed that their phone battery went flat on the trip and most of the 
same hands go up. In fact, I suspect that the Wellington branch of a 
major parallel import discounter here does half of its business with 
folk who've driven down and think their battery is broken and they need 
a new phone.

On 30/01/2025 4:27 pm, Mike Puchol via Starlink wrote:
> The report touches on the thorny topic of the uplink, however, IMHO it 
> leaves out one important consideration: battery life. The assumptions 
> on link budget work on the basis of the UE employing full power at the 
> full duty cycle, which would result in a dramatic reduction in battery 
> life of the device.
> If you have traveled to certain African countries, where mobile 
> networks rely on large and macro cells, rather than densification (for 
> cost reasons), you will have already experienced this, where your 
> smartphone's battery seems to die faster (it does!), as it's working 
> harder to reach the towers.
> I'll add to this something that Loon learned, and which was published 
> in the Loon Library (page 180), in regards to the quality of devices 
> found in the field:
> "An issue with these low-priced phones is that their LTE radio 
> performance is significantly worse than the phones Loon used during 
> the development and testing of its
> LTE subsystems. This performance readjusted Loon’s expectations for 
> the number
> of users that could be serviced, the number of GBs that could be 
> delivered, and from
> which environments the users could successfully connect to Loon."
> It is a fascinating read: 
> https://storage.googleapis.com/x-prod.appspot.com/files/The%20Loon%20Library.pdf 
>
> Best,
> Mike
>> On 29/01/2025 14:09 CET Vint Cerf via Starlink 
>> <starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> thanks for sharing this analysis with which I resonate. I doubt that 
>> the LEO constellations will scale to the same extent that 
>> ground-based cellular systems have. However, they will take some 
>> traffic. Prices might also be an issue. Interestingly, video 
>> conferencing over the Internet is a substitute for traditional 
>> telephony and comes naturally thanks to the digital nature of the 
>> transmission.
>> v
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:30 AM Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink 
>> <starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>     From: *John Strand* <js at strandconsult.dk>
>>     Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 4:23 AM
>>     Subject: Here is the first edition of the report: Will LEO
>>     Satellite Direct-to-Cellular Networks Make Traditional Mobile
>>     Networks Obsolete?
>>     To: <info at strandconsult.dk>
>>
>>
>>     Dear Colleague,
>>
>>     Here is the first edition of the report: *“Will LEO Satellite
>>     Direct-to-Cellular Networks Make Traditional Mobile Networks
>>     Obsolete?”* The report is a part of a signature series in Strand
>>     Consult´s Global Project for Business Models for Broadband Cost
>>     Recovery <https://strandconsult.dk/category/fair-cost-recovery/>.
>>
>>     This new report offers a comprehensive analysis of the role of
>>     Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites in the telecommunications
>>     industry. It examines the advancements in satellite technology,
>>     the challenges in achieving service parity with terrestrial
>>     networks, and the implications for global connectivity. It
>>     explores the technical, economic, and regulatory factors shaping
>>     the deployment of Direct-to-Cell satellite services and evaluates
>>     whether these networks can complement or replace traditional
>>     cellular infrastructure.
>>
>>     This report aims to illuminate the forces driving developments in
>>     LEO satellite networks, the challenges they face, and how these
>>     technologies will likely shape the telecommunications industry's
>>     future. It aims to provide inspiration and insights that can be
>>     used to frame discussions about the trends and transformations
>>     affecting connectivity on a global scale.
>>
>>     When reading recent media and comments on various media postings,
>>     one can quickly get the impression that satellites will replace
>>     traditional mobile networks. This narrative often simplifies a
>>     complex issue, creating the perception that satellite technology
>>     is a universal solution to global connectivity challenges.
>>     However, a more pragmatic view reveals that satellite networks
>>     like those operated by Starlink offer revolutionary opportunities
>>     but are unlikely to make terrestrial mobile networks obsolete.
>>     Instead, these technologies will coexist, each serving distinct
>>     roles in the communication ecosystem.
>>
>>     **
>>
>>     There are many mobile telecom operators which fear that low earth
>>     orbit (LEO) satellite networks like Starlink and others could
>>     impact their business in a negative way like over the top (OTT)
>>     providers. Indeed, there is a concern about traffic and revenue
>>     moving away from mobile networks to providers which do not have
>>     the same regulatory obligations or cost structure. For example,
>>     in some countries, some LEO satellite providers do not pay for
>>     the use of radio spectrum. These are important issues to examine
>>     in their short, medium and long term impacts.
>>
>>     Strand Consult’s global project for Broadband Cost Recovery and
>>     Business Models
>>     <https://strandconsult.dk/category/fair-cost-recovery/> examines
>>     the challenges for mobile telecom operators to build and run
>>     networks and the set of solutions to improve return on
>>     investment.  A key region impacted by LEO satellites is the
>>     Caribbean. Strand Consult’s report /“Gigabit Caribbean: Closing
>>     the Investment Gap in Fixed and Mobile Networks”
>>     <https://strandconsult.dk/gigabit-caribbean-closing-the-investment-gap-in-fixed-and-mobile-networks/>
>>     /describes the inherent challenge to deliver return on investment
>>     in remote areas with limited population and in the face of
>>     growing traffic from outside providers which contribute zero
>>     financially to the local economy. LEO satellites may be a
>>     double-edged sword in that they may provide connectivity in an
>>     emergency, but they do not conform to local regulatory
>>     requirements, nor do they participate locally financially.  The
>>     issue is also relevant for rural broadband providers in the USA
>>     which Strand Consult documented in its report “Broadband Cost
>>     Recovery: A Study of Business Models for 50 Broadband Providers
>>     In 24 US States.”
>>     <https://strandconsult.dk/broadband-cost-recovery-a-study-of-50-broadband-providers-in-24-us-states-new-report-from-strand-consult/>
>>
>>     **
>>
>>     *The Satellite Race to Reach the Phone.*
>>
>>     Among the various players in the Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite
>>     market, Starlink
>>     <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-1193A1.pdf>, led
>>     by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, has emerged as the frontrunner. With a
>>     network of almost 7,000 satellites operating, 300+ (2^nd
>>     generation or Gen2) satellites have Direct-to-Cell capabilities
>>     <https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/27/24307394/starlink-spacex-tmobile-direct-to-cell-satellite-fcc-approval>.
>>     SpaceX's spectrum regulatory approach outside the U.S. has been
>>     criticized for not always adhering to local licensing frameworks
>>     (e.g., cases in India, France, and South Africa). Its reliance on
>>     spectrum that local regulators have not officially granted can
>>     create tensions with governments and local telecom providers.
>>     Starlink operates a global satellite network with thousands of
>>     satellites covering areas without always having lawful access to
>>     the spectrum on which it provides services.
>>
>>     This is an even more significant challenge regarding the regular
>>     cellular spectrum used for traditional mobile cellular services
>>     licensed and used by local telecommunication companies. Thus, it
>>     requires, at least, the satellite operator to collaborate locally
>>     with telco operators who have the usage rights of the cellular
>>     spectrum of interest. Despite these challenges, Starlink’s
>>     aggressive strategy and innovative technology have placed it
>>     light years ahead of competitors like Amazon’s Kuiper
>>     <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-114A1.pdf> and
>>     Eutelsat’s OneWeb <https://oneweb.net/>. As of January 2025,
>>     Amazon's Project Kuiper has not yet launched
>>     <https://techxplore.com/news/2024-07-amazon-kuiper-delays-satellite-timeline.html>
>>     any operational satellites, including those with Direct-to-Cell
>>     (D2C) capabilities. The project is still in development, with
>>     plans to deploy a constellation of 3,236 LEO satellites to
>>     provide global broadband coverage.
>>
>>     One of the most remarkable aspects of Starlink’s success is its
>>     ability to build a functional global network without initial
>>     access to the necessary spectrum. This bold approach has drawn
>>     comparisons to Jeff Bezos’ Kuiper project, with Strand Consult
>>     humorously observing that while Bezos is still setting up a
>>     “burger bar,” Musk is already running an “interstellar McDonald’s.
>>
>>     In the report you can read about the companies that are advancing
>>     D2C connectivity through LEO satellite constellations, aiming to
>>     connect standard mobile devices directly to satellites.
>>
>>     Among them, AST SpaceMobile
>>     <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-756A1.pdf> has
>>     launched five operational satellites, detailed in FCC filings, to
>>     deliver 4G and 5G services globally, with plans to expand its
>>     network with up to 243 satellites. AST SpaceMobile's advanced
>>     phased-array antenna, BlueWalker 3
>>     <https://ast-science.com/spacemobile-network/bluewalker-3/>, is
>>     one of the most powerful in the industry required to deliver good
>>     quality services to unmodified cellular consumer devices.
>>     Similarly, Lynk Global
>>     <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-969A1.pdf> has
>>     deployed satellites to provide coverage in remote areas,
>>     emphasizing partnerships with telecom operators and regulatory
>>     approvals.
>>
>>     Geespace <https://www.geespace.com/>, part of Geely Technology
>>     Group, has launched 30 satellites in China and plans to expand to
>>     72 by 2025, targeting global broadband and D2C capabilities. The
>>     Qianfan ("Thousand Sails") constellation
>>     <https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/china-launches-first-satellites-constellation-rival-starlink-newspaper-reports-2024-08-05/>,
>>     in intent and capabilities closest to SpaceX, is another Chinese
>>     initiative that has deployed 54 satellites and aims for over
>>     15,000 by 2030, positioning itself as a major player in
>>     satellite-based communications. US and Chinese initiatives drive
>>     significant advancements in D2C technology, integrating satellite
>>     connectivity into everyday communications and addressing global
>>     coverage challenges.
>>
>>     **
>>
>>     *Some Takeaways.*
>>
>>     Direct-to-Cell LEO satellite networks face considerable
>>     technology hurdles in providing services comparable to
>>     terrestrial cellular networks.
>>
>>       * *They must overcome substantial free-space path loss* and
>>         ensure uplink connectivity from low-power mobile devices with
>>         omnidirectional antennas.
>>       * Cellular devices transmit at low power (typically 23–30 dBm),
>>         making it *very challenging for uplink cellular signals* to
>>         reach satellites in LEO at 300–1,200 km altitudes,
>>         particularly if the cellular device is indoor.
>>       * Uplink signals from multiple devices within a satellite beam
>>         area can overlap, creating *interference that challenges the
>>         satellite’s ability to separate and process individual uplink
>>         signals*.
>>       * *Must address bandwidth limitations* and efficiently
>>         reuse spectrum while minimizing interference with terrestrial
>>         and other satellite networks.
>>       * Scaling globally may *require satellites to carry varied
>>         payload configurations to accommodate regional spectrum
>>         requirements*, increasing technical complexity and deployment
>>         expenses.
>>       * Operating on terrestrial frequencies *necessitates dynamic
>>         spectrum sharing and interference mitigation strategies*,
>>         especially in densely populated areas, limiting coverage
>>         efficiency and capacity.
>>      *
>>
>>     On the regulatory front, integrating D2C satellite services into
>>     existing mobile ecosystems is complex. Spectrum licensing is a
>>     key issue, as satellite operators must either share frequencies
>>     already allocated to terrestrial mobile operators or secure
>>     dedicated satellite spectrum.
>>
>>       * *Securing access to shared or dedicated spectrum*,
>>         particularly negotiating with terrestrial operators to use
>>         licensed frequencies.
>>       * *Avoiding interference* between satellite and terrestrial
>>         networks requires detailed agreements and advanced spectrum
>>         management techniques.
>>       * *Navigating fragmented regulatory frameworks* in Europe,
>>         where national licensing requirements vary significantly.
>>       * The high administrative and operational *burden of scaling
>>         globally* diminishes economic benefits, particularly in
>>         regions where terrestrial networks already dominate.
>>
>>     The idea of D2C-capable satellite networks making terrestrial
>>     cellular networks obsolete is ambitious but fraught with
>>     practical limitations. While LEO satellites offer unparalleled
>>     reach in remote and underserved areas, they struggle to match
>>     terrestrial networks’ capacity, reliability, and low latency in
>>     urban and suburban environments. The high density of base
>>     stations in terrestrial networks enables them to handle far
>>     greater traffic volumes, especially for data-intensive applications.
>>
>>     The regulatory and operational constraints surrounding using
>>     terrestrial mobile frequencies for D2C services severely limit
>>     scalability. This fragmentation makes it difficult to achieve
>>     global coverage seamlessly and increases operational and economic
>>     inefficiencies. While D2C services hold promise for addressing
>>     connectivity gaps in remote areas, their ability to scale as a
>>     comprehensive alternative to terrestrial networks is hampered by
>>     these challenges. Unless global regulatory harmonization or
>>     innovative technical solutions emerge, D2C networks will likely
>>     remain a complementary, sub-scale solution rather than a
>>     standalone replacement for terrestrial mobile networks.
>>
>>     The report */"Will LEO Satellite Direct-to-Cellular Networks Make
>>     Traditional Mobile Networks Obsolete?"/* is valuable for mobile
>>     operators and their shareholders, policymakers, security and
>>     defense analysts, network engineers, and other professionals.
>>
>>     Let me know your feedback and questions.
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>     John Strand
>>
>>     Strand Consult is an independent, privately owned consultancy
>>     company. Our main focus is in the wireless sector, what it looks
>>     like, how it is developing and how it influences a number of
>>     other sectors. Through our research, reports, workshops and
>>     consulting, we help create and expand our customers’ revenue
>>     streams by maximising the use of all the new possibilities and
>>     opportunities that arise with new technologies and business
>>     strategies. About Strand Consult <http://www.strandreports.com>
>>
>>     Our primary customers are national and international mobile
>>     operators and our list of customers currently includes over 170
>>     mobile operators spread across Europe, South America, North
>>     America, Australia, Asia and Africa. Based on our research and
>>     work with mobile operators we additionally help many customers in
>>     the technology industry and the media sector who want to learn
>>     more about how the telecom industry is influencing their industry.
>>
>>     We are regarded as one of the leading authorities on mobile
>>     technologies, business and revenue models and distribution
>>     strategies. Our reports are both strategic and cross-disciplinary
>>     in their outlook. They do not focus on a single area, but always
>>     examine subjects from five different angles; operators,
>>     technology providers, distribution, content providers and which
>>     existing or new business strategies will have the greatest
>>     probability of being successful. Most of our customers have saved
>>     a great deal of money on consultancy services by purchasing and
>>     using our strategic reports.
>>
>>     Strand Consult is the supplier of some of the most sought after
>>     lecturers in the mobile world. We frequently speak at a great
>>     number of the International conferences about the mobile and
>>     media world and how they will develop in the future. You can read
>>     more about which conferences we will be speaking at on our
>>     website Conferences <http://www.strandconsult.dk/sw484.asp>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Starlink mailing list
>>     Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
>>     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink 
>>
>> -- 
>> Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
>> Vint Cerf
>> Google, LLC
>> 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor
>> Reston, VA 20190
>> +1 (571) 213 1346
>> until further notice
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

-- 
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel

School of Computer Science

Room 303S.594 (City Campus)

The University of Auckland
u.speidel at auckland.ac.nz 
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20250130/5ff6e421/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Starlink mailing list