Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Ambani Launches 15 Billion Dollars Space War Against Starlink
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:07:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <420d6743-7257-4a3a-9c6a-04ef0c445cbb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2n1s314p-768o-q2n1-0nn9-7q1n37rr60r2@ynat.uz>

There must be some disadvantages to flat sats.

But it's worth noting that China is using them.

Jun 30, 2026 8:51:52 AM David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>:

> Joe Hamelin wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2026 at 12:55 PM David Lang via Starlink <
>> starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I think it is going to depend a lot on who their launch provider is and who their satellite manufacturer is.
>>> 
>> 
>> Arianespace (a JV of my company and Airbus) just launched 36 Leo sats last
>> week.
> 
> My point is that SpaceX competitors are paying 3-4x as much for launch services (SpaceX list prices are noticably lower than any competitor, and their launch costs are 1/4 to 1/3 their list prices)
> 
> And if the satellites are build the traditional way, they will cost many times what starlink satellites do as well.
> 
> so if your costs to get into orbit are ~4x higher for a similar capacity satellite, you are going to have a very hard time being competitive.
> 
> the satellite industry got into the habit of thinking "launch is expensive, the cost of the satellite is trivial in comparison, so we can make the satellite more expensive to try and add to the reliability" and "satellites are really expensive, so the launch costs don't matter much". It took Elon firing the Starlink satellite construction management to break the team out of that mindset, have these other companies learned the lesson? or are they going to continue the old ways?
> 
> I can say that the fact that they all are building traditionally shaped satellites that are deployed one or two at a time from a central tower (wasted mass and space) with each satellite needing it's own deployment mechanism (more complexity and wasted mass) vs the starlink flat-pack/spin-and-release or starship pez-dispensor approaches does not give me any reason to believe that they have learned the 'cattle not pets' approach to satellite services.
> 
> It's possible that some have, but I don't see it yet.
> 
> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-21 18:11 [Starlink] Ambani Launches 15 Billion Dollars Space War Against Starlink Hesham ElBakoury
2026-06-21 19:03 ` [Starlink] " Frantisek Borsik
2026-06-21 19:11   ` Inemesit Affia
2026-06-21 19:24     ` Frantisek Borsik
2026-06-21 19:55   ` David Lang
2026-06-22  0:01     ` Joe Hamelin
2026-06-30  7:51       ` David Lang
2026-06-30  8:07         ` Inemesit Affia [this message]
2026-06-30 10:35           ` David Lang
2026-06-22  1:28 ` David Collier-Brown
2026-06-30  6:01   ` [Starlink] Partial network outage. Seems like DNS. Any active probes see anything? Inemesit Affia
2026-06-30  6:02     ` [Starlink] " Inemesit Affia
2026-06-30  6:57       ` [Starlink] A new radome colour for Starlink Ground/Earth station Inemesit Affia
2026-06-30 16:47         ` [Starlink] " J Pan
2026-06-30 16:50     ` [Starlink] Re: Partial network outage. Seems like DNS. Any active probes see anything? J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=420d6743-7257-4a3a-9c6a-04ef0c445cbb@gmail.com \
    --to=inemesitaffia@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox