From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: D.Goncz-FAX-571-395-3575@replikon.net
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Bloat] Re: Vol 185, Issue 5
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 02:16:17 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1onq9q61-40o3-pnn6-pns7-58np93687005@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOnAEVaShddgVDzjhaEC=m5VPJ_j8P0Rr219TX-1+6mitcW=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Explain how you think this resonance would happen? unlike sound, packets don't
'echo', they deliver messages, which can (and frequently do) trigger reply
messages but unlike audio resonance, the incoming packets don't add to the
outgoing packets to make a larger signal than the outgoing packets would if the
timing was a little difference.
David Lang
On Sat, 19 Sep 2026, Replikon Research, D-U-N-S/FCN 77-387-4974 wrote:
> There are two realms of analysis where things can blow up
>
> One is synergy and synergetics meaning the interactions between presumably
> interchangeable parts relevant to the interactions between presumably
> interchangeable routers and node points
>
> The other is combinatorics and that's my thing I love combinatorics!!!! The
> only thing that matters is what you choose to count and how much each part
> of what you count matters to you to put it concisely.
>
> So while I have very little to contribute I am encouraged to hear that the
> bottleneck is in the latency but the causes of the latency are
> multi-dimensional there are at least we know where the problem is not where
> that would mean we knew the causes no that's not right let me know is what
> the problem is yes the problem is latency
>
> What comes to mind is it for certain latencies there may be an echo like
> the feedback of a guitar when the amplifiers turned up too high
>
> Does that have any intuitional relationship to these very high level
> Network analyzes that you all do everyday
>
> This question of residence no not residents got darn it in the microphone
> resonance like my voice yes
>
> I think resonance and spectral radius are two characteristics of behind
> level network analysis which apply here to this question of latency because
> when spectral radius is one resonance is nearly inevitable
>
> Is the internet we have built evolving to an internet in which some
> parameterizable characteristic has a special radius of 1?
>
> I sure as hell hope not
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list -- bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to bloat-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <178979811506.1938.15903254559639098502@gauss>
2026-09-19 8:54 ` [Bloat] Re: Vol 185, Issue 5 Replikon Research, D-U-N-S/FCN 77-387-4974
2026-09-19 9:16 ` David Lang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1onq9q61-40o3-pnn6-pns7-58np93687005@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=D.Goncz-FAX-571-395-3575@replikon.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox