General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Replikon Research, D-U-N-S/FCN 77-387-4974" <Admin@replikon.net>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Bloat] Re: Vol 185, Issue 5
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 04:54:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnAEVaShddgVDzjhaEC=m5VPJ_j8P0Rr219TX-1+6mitcW=nQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178979811506.1938.15903254559639098502@gauss>

There are two realms of analysis where things can blow up

One is synergy and synergetics meaning the interactions between presumably
interchangeable parts relevant to the interactions between presumably
interchangeable routers and node points

The other is combinatorics and that's my thing I love combinatorics!!!! The
only thing that matters is what you choose to count and how much each part
of what you count matters to you to put it concisely.

So while I have very little to contribute I am encouraged to hear that the
bottleneck is in the latency but the causes of the latency are
multi-dimensional there are at least we know where the problem is not where
that would mean we knew the causes no that's not right let me know is what
the problem is yes the problem is latency

What comes to mind is it for certain latencies there may be an echo like
the feedback of a guitar when the amplifiers turned up too high

Does that have any intuitional relationship to these very high level
Network analyzes that you all do everyday

This question of residence no not residents got darn it in the microphone
resonance like my voice yes

I think resonance and spectral radius are two characteristics of behind
level network analysis which apply here to this question of latency because
when spectral radius is one resonance is nearly inevitable

Is the internet we have built evolving to an internet in which some
parameterizable characteristic has a special radius of 1?

I sure as hell hope not

       reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <178979811506.1938.15903254559639098502@gauss>
2026-09-19  8:54 ` Replikon Research, D-U-N-S/FCN 77-387-4974 [this message]
2026-09-19  9:16   ` [Bloat] Re: Vol 185, Issue 5 David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOnAEVaShddgVDzjhaEC=m5VPJ_j8P0Rr219TX-1+6mitcW=nQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=admin@replikon.net \
    --cc=D.Goncz-FAX-571-395-3575@replikon.net \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox