[Bloat] Tackling bufferbloat in 3G/4G networks: A receiver-based, TCP solution

David Collier-Brown davec-b at rogers.com
Wed Jun 6 08:30:09 EDT 2012


On 06/05/2012 03:00 PM, Ingemar s Johansson wrote:
> And thanks for an interesting report. I must say that this resembles LEDBAT quite a lot, with the exception that LEDBAT is a (mainly) sender based modification and may thus be easier to deploy. Like commented on this list (by Jonathan Morton for instance) it could be interesting to see how they compare. 
> One flaw with delay based algos (which LEDBAT tries to solve) is the sensitivity to reverse path delay (similar issue with Vegas I believe), I guess your algorithm can have the same problem or. Does not mean that LEDBAT is free of problem...
>
> Regards
> /Ingemar Johansson
>
>
I wonder how the two schemes would interact, and if it would make sense
for the sender to adjust the send window in a similar manner?

--dave

-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain
(416) 223-8968




More information about the Bloat mailing list