[Bloat] marketing #102 - giving netperf-wrapper a better name?
chromatix99 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 16:25:44 EDT 2015
> On 20 Mar, 2015, at 22:08, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) <versteb at cisco.com> wrote:
> We should call the metric "sucks-less". As in "Box A sucks less than Box B", or "Box C scored a 17 on the sucks less test".
I suspect real marketing drones would get nervous at a negative-sounding name.
My idea - which I’ve floated in the past, more than once - is that the metric should be “responsiveness”, measured in Hertz. The baseline standard would be 10Hz, corresponding to a dumb 100ms buffer. Get down into the single-digit millisecond range, as fq_codel does, and the Responsiveness goes up above 100Hz, approaching 1000Hz.
Crucially, that’s a positive sort of term, as well as trending towards bigger numbers with actual improvements in performance, and is thus more potentially marketable.
- Jonathan Morton
More information about the Bloat