[Bloat] Is still netperf a valid tool?

Sergio Belkin sebelk at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 21:22:11 EDT 2020


El lun., 15 jun. 2020 06:15, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> escribió:

> Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've seen that many of the recommended tools to diagnose/troubleshoot
> > bufferbloat use netperf.
> > Netperf in https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf has many years of
> > inactivity. In fact, in recent versions of distros don't include it.
> > So, my question is: is still netperf a reliable tool?
>
> Reliable in the sense that it works and produces results that are likely
> to be fairly close to the reality you want to measure? Absolutely.
> Reliable in the sense that you can always rely on it being available?
> Unfortunately not.
>
> The latter is more of a licensing issue, though, which unfortunately
> also means that it is not likely to be fixed... :(
>
> -Toke
>

Thanks for tour kind answers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20200615/4eb32080/attachment.html>


More information about the Bloat mailing list