[Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?

[Daniel Sterling]

I assume mwan3 doesn’t need this patch set, so you can also look at the
openwrt code to see how it configures mwan3

Once you have the dual routing configured you can just apply cake on each
WAN NIC directly

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 7:28 AM Daniel Sterling <sterling.daniel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is what came up with when I was running both DSL and cable modems.  I
> don’t use it any more but it should still work
>
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/eqhmcow/9967292/raw/d091ed7430d3c161971cbf0d20c3267b77f0c5ce/multi-routes.sh
>
> This script lets you use multiple internet connections, both simultaneously and transparently, both from the router itself and via boxes behind the router through NAT.
>
>
> For this to actually work with NAT, you most definitely need to recompile your linux kernel with the "Routing and
> # Netfilter" patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes . (Using the latest full patchset is fine.)
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:26 PM David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
>
>> I've been wanting to set this sort of thing up (the best DSL I can get is
>> 8/1,
>> and that's with a bondd DSL setup) but have not been able to find a good
>> tutorial in setting things up.
>>
>> anyone have any pointers?
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>>   On Sun, 3 May 2020, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 07:33:56 -0700
>> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
>> > To: Daniel Sterling <sterling.daniel at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>, bloat <
>> bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?
>> >
>> > not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split
>> > flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash
>> > directing flows at one or another.
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling
>> > <sterling.daniel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch
>> set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great
>> >>
>> >> http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes
>> >>
>> >> Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right
>> thing, aye?
>> >>
>> >> As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged
>> upstream :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks
>> >>
>> >> -- Dan
>> >>
>> >> On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of
>> 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second
>> connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt
>> router.
>> >>
>> >> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
>> >>
>> >> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control
>> (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.
>> >>
>> >> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Rich
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Bloat mailing list
>> >> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Bloat mailing list
>> >> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Make Music, Not War
>> >
>> > Dave Täht
>> > CTO, TekLibre, LLC
>> > http://www.teklibre.com
>> > Tel: 1-831-435-0729
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bloat mailing list
>> > Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20200504/664b4bea/attachment-0001.html>