[Cerowrt-devel] understanding_cerowrt_buildsystem

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 17:22:19 EDT 2012


Well, let's stay speculative. Needent' be tomorrow.

What is a day - with at at least a 2 hour period, preferably more -
that works for the most people?

I'm pretty flexible as to what hours I keep, so pretend I'm not in PDT...

There was a time when I was available on irc 24/7 and #bufferbloat was
a hotbed of development, but of late that's been hard, and regardless,
the effort expended, diffuse, and worse, mostly unlogged.

I'm NOT huge on "meetings" per se', but having a regular get-together
*recorded*, seems like a very good idea at this point. Particularly on
this, focused topic, initially. And to not be a "meeting" per se', but
to get some actual work done, in concert, rather than asynchronously.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej at soltysiak.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My overall thought at the moment is to hold a "building
>> openwrt/cerowrt google hangout" with as many participants as possible,
>> get some your versions built, record the thing, see what barriers
>> there are to making it easier, and smash them.
>
> Sounds good! I don't know all the time zones people are in, but I'm in CEST
> (GMT+2 at the moment).
>
>>
>> I'm back in california now and migrating back to PDT, when would be a
>> good time to get everyone together? Saturday?
>
> Short notice, but might be. I suggest you invite folks, see how many join,
> how many reject but wanted to join.
> And hold another session a week after.
>
> For the agenda I'd suggest including these topics:
> - quick walkthrough of build process
> - resolving missing file issue
> - adding new software to packages
> - any advice on kernel config?
>
>> I note that I'm very free with commit access to the ceropackages repo
>> in particular. If, in order to make forward progress on the dlna, upnp
>> issues, we have to move those into ceropackages, go for it. The whole
>> point of ceropackages was to try to find ways to quickly spin up and
>> eventually push out, new, improved, interesting packages into openwrt
>> mainline.
>
>
>>
>> Regardless pls send along your github ids, and I'll add you.
>
> Although I've done my share of coding, patching, using cvs, I'm a github
> newbe:
> https://github.com/pysiak
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>



-- 
Dave Täht
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out
with fq_codel!"



More information about the Cerowrt-devel mailing list