[Cerowrt-devel] IPv6 address assignment and naming

[Teco Boot]

The backtraces were not caused by the ip6_subtrees patch. It is Ubuntu that upgraded me to 3.8.0.28, with some free bugs. I went back to 3.8.0.27. No problems since then.

Teco

Op 16 aug. 2013, om 23:35 heeft Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:

> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Teco Boot <teco at inf-net.nl> wrote:
> The IPv6 subtrees in on its way :-). After 3.11 we can ask for backports.
> 
> I folded it into cerowrt 3.10.7-1 just now. No noise on the patch. I was scared by some of the backtraces you posted, so I'd like to keep the testing simple for a while... and... 
> 
> I still have the ADSL htb fixes to fold back in from 3.11 to 3.10, to massively update cisco's pie implementation, and to make one more tweak to codel, before I do anything other than compile testing, personally. 
> 
> Probably will be a couple days.
> 
> I have no idea the state of the babel branch on this stuff. My own use case is a system with multiple 6rd, 6in4, 6to4 tunnels in play.... 
> 
> One of my concerns was that: is there an easy way to detect at runtime via netlink if subtrees was working correctly or not?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Täht
> 
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html