[Cerowrt-devel] pie vs. fq - no contest
Aaron Wood
woody77 at gmail.com
Wed May 28 00:59:22 EDT 2014
http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2014/05/i-dont-like-this-pie-more-bufferbloat.html
PIE certain is better than nothing. But it's no fq_codel.
All I varied between the two is the queuing discipline, with the PIE target
(both directions) set to 16ms.
not impressed.
But, far better than pie did when I was in Paris, on a 16Mbps down, 1Mbps
up ADSL2+ link:
http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2014/01/comparing-queue-disciplines-in-cerowrt.html
I think those results were either the default target being wrong, or the
highly asynchronous and highly limited setup being ill-suited to PIE.
Which is concerning, as PIE is going to be deployed in 30/1 cable setups
(like the Numericable.fr setup I had in my first apartment in Paris).
-Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20140527/608c9ebb/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list