[Make-wifi-fast] Upstream Ath10k FQ_Codel Patch?

[Noah Causin]

My Archer C7 v2 says Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880.

I checked using iperf3, and it says about 40 mbps.

I remember getting at least 70mbps.

I copied Toke's patch to a new build about a month ago, when I redid my 
WiFi.  Maybe it broke some time ago.

I had been using up to date versions of that patch for months.

Noah


On 9/11/2017 4:12 PM, Jon Pike wrote:
> Hmmm, again...
>
> Doesn't the C7 have the QCA9880?  Noah,  what kind of speed do you get 
> on yours?
>
> I just checked the OpenWRT hardware page...   Seems it does. Checked 
> the C2600,  it says it does,  but not which dash number version of the 
> chip, if that makes any difference.
>
> I would have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you wouldn't 
> consider it working, really...   so interested in hearing if Noah is 
> seeing normal speeds somehow.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu at gmail.com 
> <mailto:adriannnpopescu at gmail.com?src=inbox>?
> To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke at toke.dk 
> <mailto:toke at toke.dk?src=inbox>>
> Cc: Jon Pike <jonpike54 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jonpike54 at gmail.com?src=inbox>>, 
> make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net 
> <mailto:make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox>
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300
> Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
> We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the
> firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to
> handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.
>
> I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk 
> <mailto:toke at toke.dk?src=inbox>> wrote:
> > Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu at gmail.com 
> <mailto:adriannnpopescu at gmail.com?src=inbox>> writes:
> >
> >> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500
> >> Mbps without the patch.
> >>
> >> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull support.
> >
> > Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which device is this in?
> >
> > -Toke
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke at toke.dk 
> <mailto:toke at toke.dk?src=inbox>>
> To: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu at gmail.com 
> <mailto:adriannnpopescu at gmail.com?src=inbox>>
> Cc: Jon Pike <jonpike54 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jonpike54 at gmail.com?src=inbox>>, 
> make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net 
> <mailto:make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox>
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
> Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu at gmail.com 
> <mailto:adriannnpopescu at gmail.com?src=inbox>> writes:
>
> > We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the
> > firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to
> > handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.
> >
> > I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.
>
> There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF?
>
> Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but unfortunately it's not
> something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/
>
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net 
> <mailto:Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast 
> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/attachments/20170911/8bd11eaf/attachment-0001.html>