Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: "Frantisek Borsik" <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>,
	"Network Neutrality is back! Letīs make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Jeremy Austin via Rpm" <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] Re: [Bloat] The French have decided to destroy the Internet within their own country by taxing Gigabits (Dr. Peering)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 12:33:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A6E0F9-EFC6-47B0-93C8-FBE76BD93DEC@ifi.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf2f7d692a5e42738403850d419c4a94@OS5P279MB0502.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

OMG, it seems I did something terrible. My apologies to everyone who got strange emails from me this morning.

This:


>> On Nov 2, 2026, at 08:44, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> 
>> The tax is 5 cents per Gigabyte. This is insane.

is a lie that was made up by Outlook. The email was written by someone else; auto-forward from Outlook had failed; “apply the filters again after the failure” has been removed from the Outlook interface; I found a “send again” function which, I thought, sends it again **TO ME** … not to the original recipients **on my behalf** !

I didn’t write the original message and didn’t even plan to get involved in this discussion - because:


> P.S.: My take this is half-baked and will not make it through the further legislative process in that form.

… I think so too.

I’m very, very sorry for any email noise from me today   :-(

Cheers,
Michael


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31 12:56 [NNagain] The French have decided to destroy the Internet within their own country by taxing Gigabits (Dr. Peering) Frantisek Borsik
2026-10-31 14:51 ` [NNagain] Re: [Bloat] " Sophie
2026-11-02  7:44 ` [NNagain] [Bloat] " Michael Welzl
2026-11-02 11:23   ` [NNagain] Re: [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-02 14:30     ` Sascha Meinrath
     [not found]   ` <bf2f7d692a5e42738403850d419c4a94@OS5P279MB0502.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2026-11-02 11:33     ` Michael Welzl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A6E0F9-EFC6-47B0-93C8-FBE76BD93DEC@ifi.uio.no \
    --to=michawe@ifi.uio.no \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
    --cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox